DELHI HIGH COURT;
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
W.P.(C) 21/2011 and CM No.31/2011 (stay)
DELHI STATE PUBLIC SCHOOL MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. N.K. Kaul, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Kamal Gupta, Advocate
versus
DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ANR ..... Respondents
Through: None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R
02.05.2013
There is no representation on behalf of the respondents.
The report of the Registry is that a reply has been filed by
respondent no.2 to which a rejoinder has been filed by the petitioner.
However, as per the report of the Registry, no reply has been filed
by respondent no.1.
Mr. Kaul, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner says that
they been furnished with a copy of the reply filed by respondent no.1 in
which it is broadly stated that they will abide by the orders of the
court.
Admit.
Interim order passed on 06.01.2011 is made absolute during the
pendency of the writ petition. It is made clear th
No comments:
Post a Comment